What method can be used to identify an error in an expression while editing a flow?

The option for identifying an error in an expression while editing a flow is through viewing action outputs. When you examine the action outputs after running a flow, you can see detailed information about the inputs and results of each action within the flow. This allows you to pinpoint where an error may have occurred, as the outputs show the data that was processed and any errors that were generated.

This approach is particularly useful because it provides real-time feedback. For instance, if you have a flow that includes various actions that depend on the results of previous steps, the outputs will demonstrate not just whether each action executed successfully, but also what data was passed along through the flow. If there is a problem with an expression, you can directly see how the flow behaved at that juncture.

In contrast, other methods such as checking syntax focus solely on the correctness of the written expression without providing context on how it interacts with the overall flow. Running a simulation might offer some insight, but it does not give you the specific output information necessary to troubleshoot in real-time. Analyzing logs may provide some insights too, but typically requires navigating through potentially complex logs instead of showing straightforward output results from flow execution. Thus, viewing action outputs is the most effective way to identify errors related